kamion (![[info]](http://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} kamion) wrote,@ 2008-05-29 12:20:00 |
 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
only for the few
Rowling by now so mindset to control her created universe that she no longer write for the general millionswide public but for the happy and wealthy few?
I always thought the period between ch 1 and ch 2 of Philosophers Stone was the most irreal part of the whole story: unless you believe that child abuse for ten years going unnoticed by the schoolnurse is standard. So elaborating that part is the last I was waiting for. stop fidling around in the name of charity, lady, and start the real work you keep dangling around, meaning your Encyclopedia.
What am I nagging about?
this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/2486321
She wrote an 800 letter piece about Harry Potter in the years before Hogwarts.
A good moment to ventilate my utter dislike with that same period as being more unbelievable and with less connection to reality then the flight of a hippogryph.
Obvious I am not the only one who as not that much pleased with the news:
quote:
almightytallestvoldy
at Mugglenett
You know what? As more time goes on, the more JK makes me HATE charities. >_< . . . I used to be for them (and technically still am I suppose), but she keeps writing things exclusively for them, and it's going to drive me mad. Are WE ever going to be able to read this? And the Tales of Beedle the Bard? etc. Or are the loyal fans who have been reading these books and watching these movies, who aren't billionaires just not good enough for her? o_O
Rowling by now so mindset to control her created universe that she no longer write for the general millionswide public but for the happy and wealthy few?
I always thought the period between ch 1 and ch 2 of Philosophers Stone was the most irreal part of the whole story: unless you believe that child abuse for ten years going unnoticed by the schoolnurse is standard. So elaborating that part is the last I was waiting for. stop fidling around in the name of charity, lady, and start the real work you keep dangling around, meaning your Encyclopedia.
What am I nagging about?
this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/2486321
She wrote an 800 letter piece about Harry Potter in the years before Hogwarts.
A good moment to ventilate my utter dislike with that same period as being more unbelievable and with less connection to reality then the flight of a hippogryph.
Obvious I am not the only one who as not that much pleased with the news:
quote:
almightytallestvoldy
at Mugglenett
You know what? As more time goes on, the more JK makes me HATE charities. >_< . . . I used to be for them (and technically still am I suppose), but she keeps writing things exclusively for them, and it's going to drive me mad. Are WE ever going to be able to read this? And the Tales of Beedle the Bard? etc. Or are the loyal fans who have been reading these books and watching these movies, who aren't billionaires just not good enough for her? o_O